18 shops, 56 847 products

Comparison: Kumho Crugen HP91 vs. Continental PremiumContact 6 vs. Bridgestone Turanza 6 vs. General Tire Grabber GT Plus

Table of contents:

Summary
Wet
Dry
Costs
Mutual tests
Buy %

#	Kumho Crugen HP91 /0%	Continental PremiumContact 6 /76%	Bridgestone Turanza 6 /77%	General Tire Grabber GT Plus /43%

Dimensions	R16 - R22	R15 - R22	R16 - R22	R15 - R23
Price	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices
Remove	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison

Segment

1. Continental PremiumContact 6 Premium

2. Bridgestone Turanza 6 Premium

3. Kumho Crugen HP91 Upper-middle

4. General Tire Grabber GT Plus Lowcost

Number of sizes available

1. Continental PremiumContact 6 296

2. Bridgestone Turanza 6 225

3. General Tire Grabber GT Plus 64

4. Kumho Crugen HP91 50

Number of tests

1. Continental PremiumContact 6 36x

2. Bridgestone Turanza 6 12x

3. General Tire Grabber GT Plus 2x

4. Kumho Crugen HP91 2x

Best position in test

1. Continental PremiumContact 6 1.

2. Bridgestone Turanza 6 2.

3. Kumho Crugen HP91 5.

4. General Tire Grabber GT Plus 9.

Worst position in test

1. Kumho Crugen HP91 8.

2. Continental PremiumContact 6 8.

3. General Tire Grabber GT Plus 9.

4. Bridgestone Turanza 6 16.

Average position in tests

1. Continental PremiumContact 6 3.06

2. Bridgestone Turanza 6 6.25

3. Kumho Crugen HP91 6.5

4. General Tire Grabber GT Plus 9

Year of the last test

1. Bridgestone Turanza 6 2025

2. Continental PremiumContact 6 2023

3. General Tire Grabber GT Plus 2023

4. Kumho Crugen HP91 2018

Best rating in test

1. Continental PremiumContact 6 Exemplary

2. Bridgestone Turanza 6 Exemplary

3. Kumho Crugen HP91 Satisfactory

4. General Tire Grabber GT Plus Satisfactory

Worst rating in test

1. Bridgestone Turanza 6 Good

2. Continental PremiumContact 6 Recommended

3. Kumho Crugen HP91 Satisfactory

4. General Tire Grabber GT Plus Satisfactory

Offroad

(Overall rating)

Kumho
Crugen HP91

92%

Continental
PremiumContact 6

76%

General
Tire Grabber GT Plus

74%

Bridgestone
Turanza 6

73%

Grass traction

1. Kumho Crugen HP91 83%

2. Continental PremiumContact 6 71%

3. General Tire Grabber GT Plus 64%

4. Bridgestone Turanza 6 62%

Gravel traction

1. Kumho Crugen HP91 88%

2. Bridgestone Turanza 6 87%

3. General Tire Grabber GT Plus 80%

4. Continental PremiumContact 6 65%

Mud traction

1. Kumho Crugen HP91 100%

2. Bridgestone Turanza 6 75%

3. General Tire Grabber GT Plus 73%

4. Continental PremiumContact 6 66%

Sand traction

1. Kumho Crugen HP91 96%

2. Continental PremiumContact 6 86%

3. General Tire Grabber GT Plus 83%

4. Bridgestone Turanza 6 71%

Handling on gravel

1. Kumho Crugen HP91 94%

2. Continental PremiumContact 6 93%

3. Bridgestone Turanza 6 71%

4. General Tire Grabber GT Plus 70%

Wet

(Overall rating)

Kumho
Crugen HP91

86%

Continental
PremiumContact 6

82%

Bridgestone
Turanza 6

74%

General
Tire Grabber GT Plus

67%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

1. Kumho Crugen HP91 93%

2. Continental PremiumContact 6 79%

3. Bridgestone Turanza 6 77%

4. General Tire Grabber GT Plus 68%

Wet circle cornering

1. Continental PremiumContact 6 87%

2. Kumho Crugen HP91 83%

3. Bridgestone Turanza 6 73%

4. General Tire Grabber GT Plus 62%

Wet handling

1. Kumho Crugen HP91 92%

2. Continental PremiumContact 6 87%

3. Bridgestone Turanza 6 75%

4. General Tire Grabber GT Plus 61%

Aquaplaning - cross

1. Bridgestone Turanza 6 77%

2. Kumho Crugen HP91 75%

3. Continental PremiumContact 6 68%

4. General Tire Grabber GT Plus 64%

Wet braking

1. Continental PremiumContact 6 91%

2. Kumho Crugen HP91 88%

3. General Tire Grabber GT Plus 80%

4. Bridgestone Turanza 6 70%

Wet braking according to EU label

1. Continental PremiumContact 6 A

2. General Tire Grabber GT Plus A

3. Bridgestone Turanza 6 A

4. Kumho Crugen HP91 B

Dry

(Overall rating)

Continental
PremiumContact 6

92%

Kumho
Crugen HP91

82%

Bridgestone
Turanza 6

75%

General
Tire Grabber GT Plus

64%

Dry braking

1. Continental PremiumContact 6 92%

2. General Tire Grabber GT Plus 74%

3. Bridgestone Turanza 6 71%

4. Kumho Crugen HP91 69%

Dry handling

1. Kumho Crugen HP91 95%

2. Continental PremiumContact 6 92%

3. Bridgestone Turanza 6 78%

4. General Tire Grabber GT Plus 53%

Costs

(Overall rating)

General
Tire Grabber GT Plus

88%

Bridgestone
Turanza 6

79%

Continental
PremiumContact 6

75%

Kumho
Crugen HP91

64%

Rolling resistance

1. General Tire Grabber GT Plus 88%

2. Bridgestone Turanza 6 79%

3. Continental PremiumContact 6 75%

4. Kumho Crugen HP91 64%

Fuel consumption according to EU label

1. Bridgestone Turanza 6 B

2. General Tire Grabber GT Plus C

3. Continental PremiumContact 6 C

4. Kumho Crugen HP91 E

Comfort

(Overall rating)

Kumho
Crugen HP91

96%

General
Tire Grabber GT Plus

72%

Continental
PremiumContact 6

66%

Bridgestone
Turanza 6

65%

Exterior noise

1. Kumho Crugen HP91 96%

2. General Tire Grabber GT Plus 72%

3. Bridgestone Turanza 6 65%

4. Continental PremiumContact 6 66%

Outside noise accoring to EU label

1. Kumho Crugen HP91 ?

2. General Tire Grabber GT Plus ?

3. Bridgestone Turanza 6 ?

4. Continental PremiumContact 6 ?

Add to comparison

Make

Model

Mutual Tests Available

These tyres were tested together in 1 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.

Mutual tests

Autobild Summer tyre test 2017 235/50 R18

Name	Wet	Dry	Offroad
Best values in test	1-	2+	2+
Kumho Crugen HP91 Rating: Satisfactory	3+	2-	2
Continental PremiumContact 6 Rating: Recommended	2	1-	2
Show test details

Comparison: Kumho Crugen HP91 vs. Continental PremiumContact 6 vs. Bridgestone Turanza 6 vs. General Tire Grabber GT Plus

Add to comparison

Add to comparison

Mutual Tests Available

Mutual tests

Summer

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Winter

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Allround

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands