Segment
1. Continental PremiumContact 6 Premium2. Kumho Crugen HP91 Upper-middle
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Kumho) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Germany (Continental). Generally, Continental summer tyres are slightly better rated (92%) than Kumho (58%). Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2017 235/50 R18 test, where both the Crugen HP91 and the PremiumContact 6 were tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 67% of Kumho Crugen HP91 has B wet grip rating, whereas 81% of Continental PremiumContact 6 has A rating.
| # | Kumho Crugen HP91
| Continental PremiumContact 6
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
| Dimensions | R16 - R22 | R15 - R22 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Continental PremiumContact 6 Premium2. Kumho Crugen HP91 Upper-middle
1. Continental PremiumContact 6 Exemplary2. Kumho Crugen HP91 Satisfactory
1. Continental PremiumContact 6 Recommended2. Kumho Crugen HP91 Satisfactory
1. Kumho Crugen HP91 100%
These tyres were tested together in 1 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.

| Name | Wet | Dry | Offroad | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1- | 2+ | 2+ | ||||
| Kumho Crugen HP91 Rating: Satisfactory | 3+ | 2- | 2 | ||||
| Continental PremiumContact 6 Rating: Recommended | 2 | 1- | 2 | ||||
| Show test details | |||||||