Segment
1. Kumho Crugen HP91 Upper-middle2. Apollo Apterra H/T2 Lowcost
Comparison: Kumho Crugen HP91 vs. Apollo Apterra H/T2
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Kumho) against a tyre from a manufacturer from India (Apollo). Generally, Kumho summer tyres are slightly better rated (58%) than Apollo (29%). But when it comes to comparing Kumho Crugen HP91 and Apollo Apterra H/T2, the rating is the same - 0%. The first tyre test of Kumho Crugen HP91 was done in 2017, compared to 2018 when was the Apollo Apterra H/T2 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2018 265/60 R18 test, where both the Crugen HP91 and the Apterra H/T2 were tested.
| # | Kumho Crugen HP91
| Apollo Apterra H/T2
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R16 - R22 | R16 - R18 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Kumho Crugen HP91 Satisfactory2. Apollo Apterra H/T2 Conditionally recommended
Worst rating in test
1. Kumho Crugen HP91 Satisfactory2. Apollo Apterra H/T2 Conditionally recommended
Offroad
(Overall rating)Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Costs
(Overall rating)Fuel consumption according to EU label
Comfort
(Overall rating)Outside noise accoring to EU label
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 1 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
1
Mutual tests
| Name | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kumho Crugen HP91 Rating: Satisfactory | |||||||
| Apollo Apterra H/T2 Rating: Conditionally recommended | |||||||
| Show test details | |||||||
