Segment
1. Nokian WR SUV 3 Upper-middle2. Kormoran SUV SNOW Lowcost
Comparison: Kormoran SUV SNOW vs. Nokian WR SUV 3
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Poland (Kormoran) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Finland (Nokian). Kormoran is a brand that belongs to the Michelin group. Generally, Nokian winter tyres are slightly better rated (60%) than Kormoran (19%). The first tyre test of Kormoran SUV SNOW was done in 2025, compared to 2015 when was the Nokian WR SUV 3 first tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 100% of Kormoran SUV SNOW dimensions has C wet grip rating. Most (80%) of the Nokian WR SUV 3 also have C wet ratings.
| # | Kormoran SUV SNOW
| Nokian WR SUV 3
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R16 - R20 | R15 - R21 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
1. Nokian WR SUV 3 4.25
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Nokian WR SUV 3 Highly recommended2. Kormoran SUV SNOW Weak
Worst rating in test
1. Kormoran SUV SNOW Weak
