Segment
1. Nokian Snowproof 2 SUV Upper-middle2. Kormoran SUV SNOW Lowcost
Comparison: Kormoran SUV SNOW vs. Nokian Snowproof 2 SUV
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Poland (Kormoran) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Finland (Nokian). Kormoran is a brand that belongs to the Michelin group. Generally, Nokian winter tyres are slightly better rated (60%) than Kormoran (19%). In this particular case, the Nokian Snowproof 2 SUV has a better rating of 61% compared to 22% of the Kormoran SUV SNOW. The first tyre test of Kormoran SUV SNOW was done in 2025, compared to 2023 when was the Nokian Snowproof 2 SUV first tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 100% of Kormoran SUV SNOW has C wet grip rating, whereas 100% of Nokian Snowproof 2 SUV has B rating.
| # | Kormoran SUV SNOW
| Nokian Snowproof 2 SUV
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R16 - R20 | R16 - R21 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Nokian Snowproof 2 SUV Recommended2. Kormoran SUV SNOW Weak
Worst rating in test
1. Nokian Snowproof 2 SUV Sufficient2. Kormoran SUV SNOW Weak
