Segment
1. Kormoran SUV SNOW Lowcost2. Matador MP93 Nordicca Lowcost
Comparison: Kormoran SUV SNOW vs. Matador MP93 Nordicca
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Poland (Kormoran) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Slovakia (Matador). Kormoran is a brand that belongs to the Michelin group. Matador is a brand that belongs to the Continental group. Generally, Matador winter tyres are slightly better rated (40%) than Kormoran (19%). In this particular case, the Matador MP93 Nordicca has a better rating of 40% compared to 22% of the Kormoran SUV SNOW. The first tyre test of Kormoran SUV SNOW was done in 2025, compared to 2022 when was the Matador MP93 Nordicca first tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 100% of Kormoran SUV SNOW dimensions has C wet grip rating. Most (100%) of the Matador MP93 Nordicca also have C wet ratings.
| # | Kormoran SUV SNOW
| Matador MP93 Nordicca
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R16 - R20 | R13 - R20 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
2. Matador MP93 Nordicca 23.75
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Matador MP93 Nordicca Satisfactory2. Kormoran SUV SNOW Weak
Worst rating in test
1. Matador MP93 Nordicca Satisfactory2. Kormoran SUV SNOW Weak
