Segment
1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-80 Evo Premium2. Kormoran SUV SNOW Lowcost
Comparison: Kormoran SUV SNOW vs. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-80 Evo
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Poland (Kormoran) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Bridgestone). Kormoran is a brand that belongs to the Michelin group. Generally, Bridgestone winter tyres are slightly better rated (87%) than Kormoran (19%). The first tyre test of Kormoran SUV SNOW was done in 2025, compared to 2015 when was the Bridgestone Blizzak LM-80 Evo first tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 100% of Kormoran SUV SNOW dimensions has C wet grip rating. Most (100%) of the Bridgestone Blizzak LM-80 Evo also have C wet ratings.
| # | Kormoran SUV SNOW
| Bridgestone Blizzak LM-80 Evo
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R16 - R20 | R15 - R20 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-80 Evo Still recommended2. Kormoran SUV SNOW Weak
Worst rating in test
1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-80 Evo Still recommended2. Kormoran SUV SNOW Weak
