Segment
1. Nokian WR D4 Upper-middle2. Kormoran Snowpro b2 Lowcost
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Poland (Kormoran) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Finland (Nokian). Kormoran is a brand that belongs to the Michelin group. Generally, Nokian winter tyres are slightly better rated (60%) than Kormoran (19%). But when it comes to comparing Kormoran Snowpro b2 and Nokian WR D4, the rating is the same - 0%. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2017 225/50 R17 test, where both the Snowpro b2 and the WR D4 were tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 100% of Kormoran Snowpro b2 has E wet grip rating, whereas 97% of Nokian WR D4 has B rating.
| # | Kormoran Snowpro b2
| Nokian WR D4
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
| Dimensions | R13 - R18 | R13 - R20 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Nokian WR D4 Upper-middle2. Kormoran Snowpro b2 Lowcost
1. Nokian WR D4 14.
1. Nokian WR D4 6.04
1. Nokian WR D4 Highly recommended
1. Nokian WR D4 Recommended
These tyres were tested together in 1 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.

| Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 32,2 | 25,9 | |||||
| Kormoran Snowpro b2 | 42,9 | - | |||||
| Nokian WR D4 | 35 | 27,7 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||