Segment
1. Michelin Alpin 5 Premium2. Kormoran Snowpro b2 Lowcost
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Poland (Kormoran) against a tyre from a manufacturer from France (Michelin). Kormoran is a brand that belongs to the Michelin group. Generally, Michelin winter tyres are slightly better rated (89%) than Kormoran (19%). But when it comes to comparing Kormoran Snowpro b2 and Michelin Alpin 5, the rating is the same - 0%. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2017 225/50 R17 test, where both the Snowpro b2 and the Alpin 5 were tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 100% of Kormoran Snowpro b2 has E wet grip rating, whereas 88% of Michelin Alpin 5 has B rating.
| # | Kormoran Snowpro b2
| Michelin Alpin 5
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
| Dimensions | R13 - R18 | R15 - R21 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Michelin Alpin 5 Premium2. Kormoran Snowpro b2 Lowcost
1. Michelin Alpin 5 5.88
1. Michelin Alpin 5 Very good
1. Michelin Alpin 5 Recommended
These tyres were tested together in 1 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.

| Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 32,2 | 25,9 | |||||
| Kormoran Snowpro b2 | 42,9 | - | |||||
| Michelin Alpin 5 | 33,3 | 28,7 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||