Segment
1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 Premium3. Yokohama W.drive V905 Upper-middle4. Uniroyal MS plus 77 Upper-middle5. Kormoran Snowpro b2 Lowcost6. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow Lowcost
Comparison: Kormoran Snowpro b2 vs. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 vs. Yokohama W.drive V905 vs. Uniroyal MS plus 77 vs. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow vs. Continental WinterContact TS 860
Table of contents:
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
3. Uniroyal MS plus 77 11.21
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Continental WinterContact TS 860 Very good3. Uniroyal MS plus 77 Satisfactory4. Yokohama W.drive V905 Satisfactory5. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
3. Uniroyal MS plus 77 Satisfactory4. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow Satisfactory5. Yokohama W.drive V905 Conditionally recommended
Add to comparison
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 2 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
2
Mutual tests
| Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 32,2 | 25,9 | |||||
| Kormoran Snowpro b2 | 42,9 | - | |||||
| Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 | 32,5 | 28,7 | |||||
| Yokohama W.drive V905 | 34,7 | 28,3 | |||||
| Uniroyal MS plus 77 | 36 | 28,1 | |||||
| Matador MP92 Sibir Snow | 38,4 | - | |||||
| Continental WinterContact TS 860 | 33,5 | 27,5 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 36,8 | 27,7 | |||||
| Kormoran Snowpro b2 | 48,6 | - | |||||
| Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 | 43,4 | 28,1 | |||||
| Yokohama W.drive V905 | 42,6 | 29,4 | |||||
| Uniroyal MS plus 77 | 41,7 | 28,6 | |||||
| Matador MP92 Sibir Snow | 43,1 | 28,9 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
