Segment
1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 Premium2. Kormoran Snowpro b2 Lowcost
Comparison: Kormoran Snowpro b2 vs. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Poland (Kormoran) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Bridgestone). Kormoran is a brand that belongs to the Michelin group. Generally, Bridgestone winter tyres are slightly better rated (87%) than Kormoran (19%). But when it comes to comparing Kormoran Snowpro b2 and Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001, the rating is the same - 0%. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2017 225/50 R17 test, where both the Snowpro b2 and the Blizzak LM-001 were tested. See more mutual tests below. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 100% of Kormoran Snowpro b2 has E wet grip rating, whereas 72% of Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 has B rating.
| # | Kormoran Snowpro b2
| Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R13 - R18 | R14 - R21 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
Worst rating in test
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 2 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
2
Mutual tests
| Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 32,2 | 25,9 | |||||
| Kormoran Snowpro b2 | 42,9 | - | |||||
| Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 | 32,5 | 28,7 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 36,8 | 27,7 | |||||
| Kormoran Snowpro b2 | 48,6 | - | |||||
| Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 | 43,4 | 28,1 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
