Segment
1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Upper-middle2. Kormoran Snowpro b2 Lowcost3. Barum Polaris 3 Lowcost4. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow Lowcost
Comparison: Kormoran Snowpro b2 vs. Barum Polaris 3 vs. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow vs. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
Table of contents:
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
2. Barum Polaris 3 10.6
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Barum Polaris 3 Exemplary2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Very good3. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
2. Barum Polaris 3 Satisfactory3. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow Satisfactory
Add to comparison
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 2 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
2
Mutual tests
| Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 32,2 | 25,9 | |||||
| Kormoran Snowpro b2 | 42,9 | - | |||||
| Barum Polaris 3 | 35,8 | 27,6 | |||||
| Matador MP92 Sibir Snow | 38,4 | - | |||||
| BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 | 35,1 | 25,9 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 36,8 | 27,7 | |||||
| Kormoran Snowpro b2 | 48,6 | - | |||||
| Barum Polaris 3 | 40,8 | 28,6 | |||||
| Matador MP92 Sibir Snow | 43,1 | 28,9 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
