Segment
1. Firestone Roadhawk Upper-middle2. Kormoran Road Performance Lowcost
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Poland (Kormoran) against a tyre from a manufacturer from USA (Firestone). Kormoran is a brand that belongs to the Michelin group. Generally, Firestone summer tyres are slightly better rated (69%) than Kormoran (0%). Important for this comparison is also the ADAC 2022 215/60 R16 test, where both the Road Performance and the Roadhawk were tested. See more mutual tests below. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 100% of Kormoran Road Performance has C wet grip rating, whereas 93% of Firestone Roadhawk has A rating.
| # | Kormoran Road Performance
| Firestone Roadhawk
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
| Dimensions | R15 - R16 | R15 - R21 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Firestone Roadhawk Upper-middle2. Kormoran Road Performance Lowcost
1. Firestone Roadhawk Exemplary2. Kormoran Road Performance Sufficient
1. Firestone Roadhawk Conditionally recommended2. Kormoran Road Performance Sufficient
These tyres were tested together in 2 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.

| Name | Wet | Dry | Noise | Wear | Fuel consumption | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 2,1 | 1,5 | 2,4 | 1,0 | 1,2 | ||
| Kormoran Road Performance Rating: Sufficient | 3,7 | 3,5 | 2,9 | 2,5 | 1,2 | ||
| Firestone Roadhawk Rating: Satisfactory | 2,9 | 2,2 | 3,0 | 2,0 | 2,3 | ||
| Show test details | |||||||

| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 34,5 | 34,3 | |||||
| Kormoran Road Performance | 38,2 | 43,5 | |||||
| Firestone Roadhawk | 35,2 | 36,5 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||