Segment
1. Continental PremiumContact 6 Premium2. Kormoran Road Performance Lowcost
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Poland (Kormoran) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Germany (Continental). Kormoran is a brand that belongs to the Michelin group. Generally, Continental summer tyres are slightly better rated (92%) than Kormoran (0%). The first tyre test of Kormoran Road Performance was done in 2018, compared to 2017 when was the Continental PremiumContact 6 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the ADAC 2022 215/60 R16 test, where both the Road Performance and the PremiumContact 6 were tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 100% of Kormoran Road Performance has C wet grip rating, whereas 81% of Continental PremiumContact 6 has A rating.
| # | Kormoran Road Performance
| Continental PremiumContact 6
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
| Dimensions | R15 - R16 | R15 - R22 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Continental PremiumContact 6 Premium2. Kormoran Road Performance Lowcost
1. Continental PremiumContact 6 Exemplary2. Kormoran Road Performance Sufficient
1. Continental PremiumContact 6 Recommended2. Kormoran Road Performance Sufficient
These tyres were tested together in 1 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.

| Name | Wet | Dry | Noise | Wear | Fuel consumption | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 2,1 | 1,5 | 2,4 | 1,0 | 1,2 | ||
| Kormoran Road Performance Rating: Sufficient | 3,7 | 3,5 | 2,9 | 2,5 | 1,2 | ||
| Continental PremiumContact 6 Rating: Good | 2,1 | 1,9 | 2,6 | 2,0 | 1,9 | ||
| Show test details | |||||||