Segment
1. Yokohama Bluearth AE-50 Upper-middle2. Kormoran Gamma B2 Lowcost
Comparison: Kormoran Gamma B2 vs. Yokohama Bluearth AE-50
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Poland (Kormoran) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Yokohama). Kormoran is a brand that belongs to the Michelin group. Generally, Yokohama summer tyres are slightly better rated (58%) than Kormoran (0%). But when it comes to comparing Kormoran Gamma B2 and Yokohama Bluearth AE-50, the rating is the same - 0%. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2016 205/55 R16 test, where both the Gamma B2 and the Bluearth AE-50 were tested.
| # | Kormoran Gamma B2
| Yokohama Bluearth AE-50
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R15 - R18 | R14 - R19 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
Worst rating in test
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 1 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
1
Mutual tests
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 34,6 | 27 | |||||
| Kormoran Gamma B2 | 36,6 | 37,3 | |||||
| Yokohama Bluearth AE-50 | 36,4 | 30,5 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
