Segment
1. Bridgestone Turanza T001 Premium2. Kormoran Gamma B2 Lowcost
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Poland (Kormoran) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Bridgestone). Kormoran is a brand that belongs to the Michelin group. Generally, Bridgestone summer tyres are slightly better rated (85%) than Kormoran (0%). But when it comes to comparing Kormoran Gamma B2 and Bridgestone Turanza T001, the rating is the same - 0%. The first tyre test of Kormoran Gamma B2 was done in 2016, compared to 2015 when was the Bridgestone Turanza T001 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2016 205/55 R16 test, where both the Gamma B2 and the Turanza T001 were tested.
| # | Kormoran Gamma B2
| Bridgestone Turanza T001
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
| Dimensions | R15 - R18 | R15 - R19 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Bridgestone Turanza T001 Premium2. Kormoran Gamma B2 Lowcost
1. Bridgestone Turanza T001 Satisfactory
These tyres were tested together in 1 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.

| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 34,6 | 27 | |||||
| Kormoran Gamma B2 | 36,6 | 37,3 | |||||
| Bridgestone Turanza T001 | 36,6 | 28,7 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||