Segment
2. Nokian Seasonproof Upper-middle3. Kormoran All Season Lowcost
Comparison: Kormoran All Season vs. Nokian Seasonproof vs. Bridgestone Weather Control A005 EVO vs. Hankook Kinergy 4S H740
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
1. Kormoran All Season 17.67
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Bridgestone Weather Control A005 EVO Exemplary2. Nokian Seasonproof Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
1. Nokian Seasonproof Satisfactory2. Bridgestone Weather Control A005 EVO Conditionally recommended
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking
Wet circle cornering
Wet handling
Aquaplaning - cross
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Wet braking according to EU label
Snow
(Overall rating)Snow acceleration
Snow braking
Snow handling
Snow traction
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry braking
Dry handling
Comfort
(Overall rating)Exterior noise
Comfort
Outside noise accoring to EU label
1. Kormoran All Season 70 dB
Costs
(Overall rating)Rolling resistance
Fuel consumption according to EU label
Add to comparison
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 1 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
1
Mutual tests
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 39,9 | 44,4 | |||||
| Kormoran All Season | 42,4 | 61 | |||||
| Nokian Seasonproof | 46,3 | 52,4 | |||||
| Bridgestone Weather Control A005 EVO | 41,4 | 44,4 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
