Segment
1. Vredestein Quatrac Pro Premium2. Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 Premium3. Kleber Quadraxer 3 Upper-middle
Comparison: Kleber Quadraxer 3 vs. Vredestein Quatrac Pro vs. Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Vredestein Quatrac Pro Exemplary2. Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 Exemplary3. Kleber Quadraxer 3 Highly recommended
Worst rating in test
3. Vredestein Quatrac Pro Conditionally recommended
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking according to EU label
Snow
(Overall rating)Dry
(Overall rating)Costs
(Overall rating)Fuel consumption according to EU label
Comfort
(Overall rating)Outside noise accoring to EU label
Add to comparison
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 2 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
2
Mutual tests
| Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| Kleber Quadraxer 3 Rating: Good | 2- | 2 | 2 | ||||
| Vredestein Quatrac Pro Rating: Good | 2 | 2- | 2- | ||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kleber Quadraxer 3 Rating: Good | |||||||
| Vredestein Quatrac Pro Rating: Conditionally recommended | |||||||
| Show test details | |||||||
