Segment
1. Vredestein Quatrac Pro Premium2. Kleber Quadraxer 3 Upper-middle3. Toyo Celsius AS2 Upper-middle4. Avon ZV7 Lowcost
Comparison: Kleber Quadraxer 3 vs. Vredestein Quatrac Pro vs. Avon ZV7 vs. Toyo Celsius AS2
| # | Kleber Quadraxer 3
| Vredestein Quatrac Pro
| Avon ZV7
| Toyo Celsius AS2
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
 |  |  |  | ||
| Dimensions | R14 - R20 | R17 - R22 | R13 - R21 | R15 - R20 | |
| Price | |||||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
1. Avon ZV7 278
Number of tests
Best position in test
4. Avon ZV7 8.
Worst position in test
4. Avon ZV7 42.
Average position in tests
3. Toyo Celsius AS2 11.644. Avon ZV7 18.55
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Vredestein Quatrac Pro Exemplary2. Kleber Quadraxer 3 Highly recommended3. Toyo Celsius AS2 Satisfactory4. Avon ZV7 Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
2. Toyo Celsius AS2 Conditionally recommended3. Vredestein Quatrac Pro Conditionally recommended4. Avon ZV7 Sufficient
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking according to EU label
Snow
(Overall rating)Dry
(Overall rating)Costs
(Overall rating)Fuel consumption according to EU label
Comfort
(Overall rating)Outside noise accoring to EU label
Add to comparison
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 2 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
2
Mutual tests
| Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| Kleber Quadraxer 3 Rating: Good | 2- | 2 | 2 | ||||
| Vredestein Quatrac Pro Rating: Good | 2 | 2- | 2- | ||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kleber Quadraxer 3 Rating: Good | |||||||
| Vredestein Quatrac Pro Rating: Conditionally recommended | |||||||
| Toyo Celsius AS2 Rating: Conditionally recommended | |||||||
| Show test details | |||||||
