18 shops, 56 847 products

Comparison: Kleber Quadraxer 3 vs. Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 vs. Toyo Celsius AS2 vs. Michelin CrossClimate 2

Table of contents:

Summary
Wet
Dry
Snow
Costs
Mutual tests
Buy %

#	Kleber Quadraxer 3 /79%	Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 /87%	Toyo Celsius AS2 /52%	Michelin CrossClimate 2 /91%

Dimensions	R14 - R20	R14 - R20	R15 - R20	R15 - R21
Price	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices
Remove	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison

When comparing the Kleber Quadraxer 3 and the Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 across multiple independent tests, clear trade-offs appear: the Kleber is a winter‑leaning all‑rounder with excellent aquaplaning and snow behavior, while the Hankook is the more rounded performer with stronger dry and wet braking and a higher overall score.

Quick links: Kleber Quadraxer 3 — manufacturer page: Kleber. Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 — manufacturer page: Hankook. Neither model has been replaced by a newer tyre in our database.

Summary of test data and positions

Overall ratings (our site): Hankook 89% vs Kleber 82%.

Autobild group test (15 tyres): Hankook placed 3rd, Kleber 4th — a narrow advantage to Hankook in overall ranking.

Independent test comments consistently highlight: Kleber’s snow traction, aquaplaning resistance and comfort; Hankook’s dry handling, short dry/wet braking and low rolling resistance.

Kleber Quadraxer 3 — strengths & weaknesses
Strengths: the Quadraxer 3 repeatedly scores highly for snow braking, snow handling, aquaplaning resistance and ride comfort. Tests call it a “snow king” with performance approaching winter tyre levels while remaining competent on dry roads. It is also praised for stable behavior in water and for relatively short dry braking distances.
Weaknesses: reviewers note delayed steering response and understeer on wet surfaces, which reduce driving precision in demanding wet handling. Overall rating is solid but below the Hankook, reflecting the more specialist leaning toward snowy/wet safety rather than all‑round sporting feel.

Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 — strengths & weaknesses
Strengths: the Kinergy 4S2 scores top marks for dry handling, short dry and wet braking distances, comfort and low rolling resistance. Multiple reports call it a “dry dynamics” tyre that still performs very well on snow and ice, and it took the higher ranking in mixed test fields.
Weaknesses: its main compromises are poorer aquaplaning resistance and only average snow performance in some wet‑heavy or deep‑snow scenarios. Some testers also mention average longevity and economy relative to peers.

Head‑to‑head verdict
Across the combined test evidence, the Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 is the better all‑round choice for drivers who want a balanced, high‑scoring tyre with superior dry and wet braking and low rolling resistance. The Kleber Quadraxer 3 is the stronger pick if your priority is best possible performance in snow and strong aquaplaning resistance — especially valuable in regions with frequent slush, standing water or heavy winter conditions.

If you want the higher overall test placing and more confident dry performance, choose the Hankook; if you prioritise winter safety and water handling, the Kleber is the specialist option. Both are solid all‑season/allround contenders — the final choice depends on the local climate and your driving priorities.

Segment

1. Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 Premium

2. Michelin CrossClimate 2 Premium

3. Kleber Quadraxer 3 Upper-middle

4. Toyo Celsius AS2 Upper-middle

Number of sizes available

1. Michelin CrossClimate 2 151

2. Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 135

3. Kleber Quadraxer 3 111

4. Toyo Celsius AS2 81

Number of tests

1. Michelin CrossClimate 2 24x

2. Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 20x

3. Toyo Celsius AS2 14x

4. Kleber Quadraxer 3 13x

Best position in test

1. Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 1.

2. Michelin CrossClimate 2 1.

3. Kleber Quadraxer 3 4.

4. Toyo Celsius AS2 7.

Worst position in test

1. Michelin CrossClimate 2 9.

2. Kleber Quadraxer 3 9.

3. Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 13.

4. Toyo Celsius AS2 16.

Average position in tests

1. Michelin CrossClimate 2 2.71

2. Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 4.65

3. Kleber Quadraxer 3 6.31

4. Toyo Celsius AS2 11.64

Year of the last test

1. Kleber Quadraxer 3 2025

2. Michelin CrossClimate 2 2025

3. Toyo Celsius AS2 2025

4. Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 2024

Best rating in test

1. Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 Exemplary

2. Kleber Quadraxer 3 Highly recommended

3. Michelin CrossClimate 2 Test winner

4. Toyo Celsius AS2 Satisfactory

Worst rating in test

1. Michelin CrossClimate 2 Good

2. Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 Good

3. Kleber Quadraxer 3 Good

4. Toyo Celsius AS2 Conditionally recommended

Wet

(Overall rating)

Michelin
CrossClimate 2

73%

Hankook
Kinergy 4S2 H750

73%

Kleber
Quadraxer 3

70%

Toyo
Celsius AS2

65%

Wet handling

1. Michelin CrossClimate 2 68%

2. Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 68%

3. Toyo Celsius AS2 52%

4. Kleber Quadraxer 3 49%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

1. Kleber Quadraxer 3 84%

2. Toyo Celsius AS2 78%

3. Michelin CrossClimate 2 77%

4. Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 67%

Wet braking

1. Michelin CrossClimate 2 79%

2. Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 71%

3. Kleber Quadraxer 3 66%

4. Toyo Celsius AS2 51%

Aquaplaning - cross

1. Toyo Celsius AS2 90%

2. Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 82%

3. Kleber Quadraxer 3 79%

4. Michelin CrossClimate 2 72%

Wet circle cornering

1. Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 79%

2. Kleber Quadraxer 3 70%

3. Michelin CrossClimate 2 68%

4. Toyo Celsius AS2 56%

Wet braking according to EU label

1. Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 B

2. Michelin CrossClimate 2 B

3. Kleber Quadraxer 3 ?

4. Toyo Celsius AS2 ?

Snow

(Overall rating)

Michelin
CrossClimate 2

91%

Kleber
Quadraxer 3

86%

Hankook
Kinergy 4S2 H750

80%

Toyo
Celsius AS2

67%

Snow handling

1. Michelin CrossClimate 2 87%

2. Kleber Quadraxer 3 87%

3. Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 81%

4. Toyo Celsius AS2 64%

Snow traction

1. Michelin CrossClimate 2 94%

2. Kleber Quadraxer 3 84%

3. Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 78%

4. Toyo Celsius AS2 60%

Snow braking

1. Kleber Quadraxer 3 88%

2. Michelin CrossClimate 2 85%

3. Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 85%

4. Toyo Celsius AS2 77%

Snow cornering

1. Michelin CrossClimate 2 97%

2. Kleber Quadraxer 3 84%

3. Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 74%

4. Toyo Celsius AS2 66%

Dry

(Overall rating)

Michelin
CrossClimate 2

86%

Kleber
Quadraxer 3

77%

Hankook
Kinergy 4S2 H750

74%

Toyo
Celsius AS2

67%

Dry handling

1. Michelin CrossClimate 2 81%

2. Kleber Quadraxer 3 75%

3. Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 76%

4. Toyo Celsius AS2 68%

Dry braking

1. Michelin CrossClimate 2 92%

2. Kleber Quadraxer 3 83%

3. Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 74%

4. Toyo Celsius AS2 67%

Costs

(Overall rating)

Toyo
Celsius AS2

81%

Kleber
Quadraxer 3

69%

Hankook
Kinergy 4S2 H750

69%

Michelin
CrossClimate 2

63%

Rolling resistance

1. Kleber Quadraxer 3 81%

2. Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 77%

3. Michelin CrossClimate 2 75%

4. Toyo Celsius AS2 67%

Price/value

1. Toyo Celsius AS2 88%

2. Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 67%

3. Kleber Quadraxer 3 63%

4. Michelin CrossClimate 2 48%

Mileage

1. Toyo Celsius AS2 88%

2. Michelin CrossClimate 2 65%

3. Kleber Quadraxer 3 64%

4. Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 63%

Fuel consumption according to EU label

1. Michelin CrossClimate 2 C

2. Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 C

3. Toyo Celsius AS2 ?

4. Kleber Quadraxer 3 ?

Comfort

(Overall rating)

Kleber
Quadraxer 3

79%

Michelin
CrossClimate 2

78%

Hankook
Kinergy 4S2 H750

72%

Toyo
Celsius AS2

67%

Exterior noise

1. Michelin CrossClimate 2 82%

2. Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 81%

3. Kleber Quadraxer 3 77%

4. Toyo Celsius AS2 68%

Comfort

1. Kleber Quadraxer 3 88%

2. Michelin CrossClimate 2 82%

3. Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 75%

4. Toyo Celsius AS2 73%

Outside noise accoring to EU label

1. Kleber Quadraxer 3 ?

2. Michelin CrossClimate 2 ?

3. Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 ?

4. Toyo Celsius AS2 ?

Add to comparison

Make

Model

Mutual Tests Available

These tyres were tested together in 6 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.

Mutual tests

Autobild Allyear tyre test 2025 215/55 R17

Name	Wet	Dry	Snow
Best values in test	1-	1	1
KLEBER Quadraxer 3 Rating: Satisfactory	1-	1	1
Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 Rating: Exemplary	2	1-	2
Show test details

Tyre Reviews Allyear tyre test 2023 195/65 R15

Name
Kleber Quadraxer 3 Rating: Highly recommended
Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 Rating: Highly recommended
Toyo Celsius AS2
Michelin CrossClimate 2 Rating: Test winner
Show test details

Autobild Allyear tyre test 2023 225/45 R17

Name	Stopping distance on dry	Stopping distance on wet
Best values in test	37.7	45
Kleber Quadraxer 3	38.3	48.5
Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750	41.3	49.5
Toyo Celsius AS2	40.9	50.6
Michelin CrossClimate 2	37.7	47
Show test details

Autobild Allyear tyre test 2023 225/45 R17

Name
Kleber Quadraxer 3 Rating: Good
Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 Rating: Good
Toyo Celsius AS2 Rating: Satisfactory
Michelin CrossClimate 2 Rating: Exemplary
Show test details

Autobild Allyear tyre test 2022 195/55 R16

Name	Stopping distance on dry	Stopping distance on wet
Best values in test	39,9	44,4
Kleber Quadraxer 3	40,3	49,4
Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750	42,1	48
Toyo Celsius AS2	43,5	53,2
Michelin CrossClimate 2	39,9	49,2
Show test details

Autobild Allyear tyre test 2022 195/55 R16

Name	Wet	Dry	Snow	Running costs
Best values in test	1-	2+	1-	1
Kleber Quadraxer 3 Rating: Good	2	2+	2+	2-
Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 Rating: Good	2	2+	1-	3+
Toyo Celsius AS2 Rating: Satisfactory	3+	2-	2	1
Michelin CrossClimate 2 Rating: Satisfactory	2-	2+	1-	3
Show test details

Comparison: Kleber Quadraxer 3 vs. Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 vs. Toyo Celsius AS2 vs. Michelin CrossClimate 2

Add to comparison

Add to comparison

Mutual Tests Available

Mutual tests

Summer

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Winter

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Allround

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands