Segment
1. Kleber Quadraxer 2 Upper-middle2. Kumho Solus HA31 Upper-middle3. Fulda MultiControl Lowcost
Comparison: Kleber Quadraxer 2 vs. Kumho Solus HA31 vs. Fulda MultiControl
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
1. Kumho Solus HA31 8.332. Kleber Quadraxer 2 12.633. Fulda MultiControl 23.78
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
2. Fulda MultiControl Recommended3. Kumho Solus HA31 Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
2. Fulda MultiControl Recommended3. Kumho Solus HA31 Satisfactory
Wet
(Overall rating)Aquaplaning - cross
Wet handling
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Wet braking
Wet braking according to EU label
Snow
(Overall rating)Snow handling
Snow traction
Snow braking
Costs
(Overall rating)Rolling resistance
Fuel consumption according to EU label
Comfort
(Overall rating)Exterior noise
Outside noise accoring to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry braking
Dry handling
Add to comparison
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 1 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
1
Mutual tests
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 39,5 | 46,3 | |||||
| Kleber Quadraxer 2 | 44,5 | 52,6 | |||||
| Kumho Solus HA31 | 43,8 | 49,5 | |||||
| Fulda MultiControl | 45,7 | 57 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
