Segment
1. Kleber Quadraxer 2 Upper-middle2. Kumho Solus HA31 Upper-middle
Comparison: Kleber Quadraxer 2 vs. Kumho Solus HA31
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from France (Kleber) against a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Kumho). Kleber is a brand that belongs to the Michelin group. Generally, Kleber allround tyres are slightly better rated (75%) than Kumho (65%). But when it comes to comparing Kleber Quadraxer 2 and Kumho Solus HA31, the rating is the same - 0%. The first tyre test of Kleber Quadraxer 2 was done in 2018, compared to 2016 when was the Kumho Solus HA31 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2019 225/45 R17 test, where both the Quadraxer 2 and the Solus HA31 were tested. We also know where Quadraxer 2 is made - Poland.
| # | Kleber Quadraxer 2
| Kumho Solus HA31
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R13 - R20 | R13 - R18 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
1. Kumho Solus HA31 8.332. Kleber Quadraxer 2 12.63
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
2. Kumho Solus HA31 Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
2. Kumho Solus HA31 Satisfactory
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking
Aquaplaning - cross
Wet handling
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Wet braking according to EU label
Snow
(Overall rating)Snow braking
Snow handling
Snow traction
Costs
(Overall rating)Rolling resistance
Fuel consumption according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry handling
Dry braking
Comfort
(Overall rating)Exterior noise
Outside noise accoring to EU label
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 39,5 | 46,3 | |||||
| Kleber Quadraxer 2 | 44,5 | 52,6 | |||||
| Kumho Solus HA31 | 43,8 | 49,5 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
