In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from France (Kleber) against a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Kumho). Kleber is a brand that belongs to the Michelin group. Generally, Kleber winter tyres are slightly better rated (77%) than Kumho (63%). In this particular case, the Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ has a better rating of 87% compared to 77% of the Kleber KRISALP HP3. The first tyre test of Kleber KRISALP HP3 was done in 2017, compared to 2025 when was the Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2025 225/40 R18 test, where both the KRISALP HP3 and the WinterCraft WP52+ were tested. See more mutual tests below.
These tyres were tested together in 1 test(s) with detailed performance data. This page shows you a comprehensive comparison based on actual head-to-head test results instead of general rankings.
You can explore discipline-by-discipline comparisons, view the spider chart, check price differences, and see which tests were used for this analysis. Or view the general comparison →
Detailed head-to-head comparison based on actual test results
| Organization | Season | Year | Dimension | Action |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Autobild
|
Winter
|
2025 | 225/40 R18 | View |
Kleber KRISALP HP3
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
Kleber KRISALP HP3
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
Kleber KRISALP HP3
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
Kleber KRISALP HP3
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
Kleber KRISALP HP3
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
Kleber KRISALP HP3
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
Kleber KRISALP HP3
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
Kleber KRISALP HP3
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
Kleber KRISALP HP3
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
Kleber KRISALP HP3
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
Visual comparison of all performance categories from mutual tests.
Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.