Segment
1. Kleber Dynaxer UHP Upper-middle2. Sava Intensa UHP 2 Lowcost
Comparison: Kleber Dynaxer UHP vs. Sava Intensa UHP 2
Table of contents:
| # | Kleber Dynaxer UHP
| Sava Intensa UHP 2
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R17 - R20 | R17 - R20 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
The comparison of two prominent summer tyres, Kleber Dynaxer UHP and Sava Intensa UHP 2, reveals distinct strengths and weaknesses of each model. Produced by leading manufacturers Kleber and Sava, these tyres show variances in performance based on a rigorous set of tests.
The Kleber Dynaxer UHP rated at 48%, is noted for its exterior noise reduction and high mileage efficiency, with Autobild commending its quiet roll resistance. However, the tyre fared poorly under wet conditions, displaying mediocre grip and limited aquaplaning reserves. Despite its shortcomings, its position at number 15 in the Autobild test out of 53 models testifies to its overall quality.
On the other hand, the Sava Intensa UHP 2 maintaining a higher rating at 67%, surpasses its predecessor, the Sava Intensa UHP. Its primary strengths lie in its performance in aquaplaning and its solid price-to-value ratio. Short dry braking distances, low roll resistance and a competitive price point saw it grabbing the 17th position in the same Autobild test.
While both tyres offer distinct advantages, passive understeering and the limited aquaplaning reserves witnessed in testing situations limit the Sava Intensa UHP 2's total score. Similarly, the Kleber Dynaxer UHP's defection under wet conditions underscore its limitations.
To summarize, neither tyre stands out as the absolute winner. The Kleber Dynaxer UHP's high mileage efficiency and noise reduction are tempered by its underperformance in wet conditions. Consequently, it remains a solid choice for drivers in relatively dry climates. Comparatively, budget-conscious customers or those prioritizing dry traction might find the Sava Intensa UHP 2 more suitable despite its shortcomings. Deciding on the 'better' tyre ultimately depends on the specific requirements and preferences of the driver.
However, on a broader scope, based on overall proxies for quality, the Sava Intensa UHP 2 does edge out, albeit narrowly, the Kleber Dynaxer UHP, considering its overall better rating and performance in several test categories.
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
1. Sava Intensa UHP 2 12.86
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Sava Intensa UHP 2 Satisfactory2. Kleber Dynaxer UHP Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
1. Kleber Dynaxer UHP Satisfactory2. Sava Intensa UHP 2 Still recommended
Wet
(Overall rating)Aquaplaning - cross
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Wet handling
Wet circle cornering
Wet braking according to EU label
Costs
(Overall rating)Mileage
Price/value
Rolling resistance
Fuel consumption according to EU label
Comfort
(Overall rating)Exterior noise
Outside noise accoring to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry handling
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 5 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
5
Mutual tests
| Name | Wet | Dry | Running costs | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 2+ | 1- | 1 | ||||
| Kleber Dynaxer UHP Rating: Satisfactory | 3+ | 2- | 2 | ||||
| Sava Intensa UHP 2 Rating: Satisfactory | 2- | 2- | 2 | ||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 58.1 | 24.8 | |||||
| Kleber Dynaxer UHP | 64.5 | 28 | |||||
| Sava Intensa UHP 2 | 61.7 | 27.4 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 32,1 | 28,7 | |||||
| Kleber Dynaxer UHP | 34,1 | 32,2 | |||||
| Sava Intensa UHP 2 | 34,7 | 35,5 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | Running costs | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1 | 1 | 1 | ||||
| Kleber Dynaxer UHP Rating: Satisfactory | 3+ | 2 | 2 | ||||
| Sava Intensa UHP 2 Rating: Good | 2- | 2+ | 1- | ||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 34,2 | 28,7 | |||||
| Kleber Dynaxer UHP | 35,9 | 32,1 | |||||
| Sava Intensa UHP 2 | 35,7 | 32,8 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
