Segment
1. Kleber Dynaxer HP3 Upper-middle2. Kumho Ecsta HS51 Upper-middle
Comparison: Kleber Dynaxer HP3 vs. Kumho Ecsta HS51
Table of contents:
| # | Kleber Dynaxer HP3
| Kumho Ecsta HS51
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R14 - R19 | R14 - R18 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Kleber Dynaxer HP3 and Kumho Ecsta HS51 are both well-regarded summer tyres. Our comparison favours the Kumho Ecsta HS51 slightly more, with it earning a rating of 45% compared to the Kleber Dynaxer HP3's 41%. However, both tyres consistently perform well in testing.
In the ADAC test, the Kleber Dynaxer HP3 ranked 11 out of 12 tyres, making it a commendable choice for a summer tyre. In the same test, the Kumho Ecsta HS51 outperformed the Kleber tyre, claiming the 10th spot. Given the competitive nature of the tyre market, a one-position difference may seem small but it is an important distinction.
Of note are the Kumho Ecsta HS51's best features:, which include "Aquaplaning - longitudal", "Wet braking", and "Wet circle cornering". An excellent balance of features that enhanced the overall performance of the tyre in the wet conditions typical of summer months.
In the Autobild test, the Kuhmo Ecsta HS51 again ranked higher at 17 out of 50, compared to the Kleber Dynaxer HP3 which achieved 19th spot out of 50 tested tyres. Both tyres performed admirably out of a large pool of competitors, but again the Kuhmo edges out the Kleber in terms of rank.
For those interested, the Kumho Ecsta HS52 is the newer tyre model that replaced the HS51, though it should be noted that the HS51 continues to demonstrate strong performance in testing. The manufacturer of these summer tyres is Kumho, a brand known for its robust and reliable tyres. As for Kleber, there isn't a newer version available to replace the Kleber Dynaxer HP3.
In conclusion, both the Kleber Dynaxer HP3 and Kumho Ecsta HS51 are competitive summer tyre options. Their rankings in ADAC and Autobild tests are commendable, and they both demonstrate a balanced set of strengths. However, the overall stronger performance of Kumho Ecsta HS51 and its slightly higher rating make it a more favourable option for those seeking a top-performing summer tyre.
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Kumho Ecsta HS51 Exemplary2. Kleber Dynaxer HP3 Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
1. Kleber Dynaxer HP3 Satisfactory2. Kumho Ecsta HS51 Satisfactory
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking according to EU label
Costs
(Overall rating)Fuel consumption according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Comfort
(Overall rating)Outside noise accoring to EU label
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Wet | Dry | Noise | Wear | Fuel consumption | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 2,2 | 1,7 | 2,1 | 1,0 | 1,2 | ||
| Kleber Dynaxer HP3 Rating: Satisfactory | 3,3 | 2,4 | 3,3 | 2,0 | 1,8 | ||
| Kumho Ecsta HS51 Rating: Satisfactory | 2,2 | 3,0 | 2,5 | 2,5 | 2,5 | ||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 34,1 | 34,6 | |||||
| Kleber Dynaxer HP3 | 37,7 | 44,69 | |||||
| Kumho Ecsta HS51 | 36,9 | 38 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 34,6 | 27 | |||||
| Kleber Dynaxer HP3 | 37,7 | 31,2 | |||||
| Kumho Ecsta HS51 | 38,6 | 29,4 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
