Segment
1. Kenda Kenetica Pro KR210 Lowcost2. Nexen N Fera Primus Lowcost
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Taiwan (Kenda) against a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Nexen). Generally, Nexen summer tyres are slightly better rated (67%) than Kenda (58%). In this particular case, the Nexen N Fera Primus has a better rating of 66% compared to 58% of the Kenda Kenetica Pro KR210. The first tyre test of Kenda Kenetica Pro KR210 was done in 2023, compared to 2022 when was the Nexen N Fera Primus first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2024 205/55 R16 test, where both the Kenetica Pro KR210 and the N Fera Primus were tested. See more mutual tests below.
# | Kenda Kenetica Pro KR210
| Nexen N Fera Primus
| Add to comparison |
---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
Dimensions | R15 - R19 | ||
Price | |||
Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Kenda Kenetica Pro KR210 Lowcost2. Nexen N Fera Primus Lowcost
1. Nexen N Fera Primus 12.67
2. Nexen N Fera Primus Satisfactory
2. Nexen N Fera Primus Satisfactory
Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 35,4 | 25,8 | |||||
Kenda Kenetica Pro KR210 | 38,6 | 31,2 | |||||
Nexen N fera Primus | 37,2 | 27,7 | |||||
Show test details |
Name | Enviromental impact | Driving safety | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 1,3 | 1,8 | |||||
Kenda Kenetica Pro KR210 Rating: Good | 3,0 | 2,4 | |||||
Nexen N Fera Primus Rating: Good | 3,1 | 2,3 | |||||
Show test details |