Segment
1. Vredestein Quatrac Pro+ Premium2. Kenda Kenetica 4S SUV Lowcost
Comparison: Kenda Kenetica 4S SUV vs. Vredestein Quatrac Pro+
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Taiwan (Kenda) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Holland (Vredestein). Generally, Vredestein allround tyres are slightly better rated (69%) than Kenda (0%). Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2023 235/65 R17 test, where both the Kenetica 4S SUV and the Quatrac Pro+ were tested.
| # | Kenda Kenetica 4S SUV
| Vredestein Quatrac Pro+
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R17 - R22 | ||
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
Worst rating in test
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet circle cornering
Aquaplaning - cross
Wet handling
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Wet braking
Wet braking according to EU label
Snow
(Overall rating)Snow handling
Snow traction
Comfort
(Overall rating)Exterior noise
Comfort
Outside noise accoring to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry braking
Dry handling
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 1 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
1
Mutual tests
| Name | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kenda Kenetica 4S SUV Rating: Not recommended | |||||||
| Vredestein Quatrac Pro+ Rating: Good | |||||||
| Show test details | |||||||
