Segment
1. Hankook Kinergy 4S2 X H750A Premium2. Kenda Kenetica 4S SUV Lowcost
Comparison: Kenda Kenetica 4S SUV vs. Hankook Kinergy 4S2 X H750A
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Taiwan (Kenda) against a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Hankook). Generally, Hankook allround tyres are slightly better rated (82%) than Kenda (0%). The first tyre test of Kenda Kenetica 4S SUV was done in 2023, compared to 2021 when was the Hankook Kinergy 4S2 X H750A first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2023 235/65 R17 test, where both the Kenetica 4S SUV and the Kinergy 4S2 X H750A were tested.
| # | Kenda Kenetica 4S SUV
| Hankook Kinergy 4S2 X H750A
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R18 - R18 | ||
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Hankook Kinergy 4S2 X H750A Exemplary
Worst rating in test
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking
Wet circle cornering
Aquaplaning - cross
Wet handling
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Wet braking according to EU label
Snow
(Overall rating)Snow traction
Snow handling
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry braking
Dry handling
Comfort
(Overall rating)Exterior noise
Comfort
Outside noise accoring to EU label
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 1 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
1
Mutual tests
| Name | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kenda Kenetica 4S SUV Rating: Not recommended | |||||||
| Hankook Kinergy 4S2 X H750A Rating: Exemplary | |||||||
| Show test details | |||||||
