Segment
1. Yokohama Bluearth AE-50 Upper-middle
Comparison: Insa Turbo Ecosaver Plus vs. Yokohama Bluearth AE-50
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from (Insa) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Yokohama). Generally, Yokohama summer tyres are slightly better rated (58%) than Insa (0%). But when it comes to comparing Insa Turbo Ecosaver Plus and Yokohama Bluearth AE-50, the rating is the same - 0%. The first tyre test of Insa Turbo Ecosaver Plus was done in 2018, compared to 2016 when was the Yokohama Bluearth AE-50 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2018 195/65 R15 test, where both the Turbo Ecosaver Plus and the Bluearth AE-50 were tested.
| # | Insa Turbo Ecosaver Plus
| Yokohama Bluearth AE-50
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R15 - R15 | R14 - R19 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
Worst rating in test
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 1 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
1
Mutual tests
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 34,5 | 34,3 | |||||
| Insa Turbo Ecosaver Plus | 42,4 | 42,6 | |||||
| Yokohama Bluearth AE-50 | 37,7 | 40,2 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
