Segment
1. GT Radial Champiro FE1 Lowcost
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from (Insa) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Singapore (GT). Generally, GT summer tyres are slightly better rated (51%) than Insa (0%). But when it comes to comparing Insa Turbo Ecosaver Plus and GT Radial Champiro FE1, the rating is the same - 0%. The first tyre test of Insa Turbo Ecosaver Plus was done in 2018, compared to 2016 when was the GT Radial Champiro FE1 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2018 195/65 R15 test, where both the Turbo Ecosaver Plus and the Radial Champiro FE1 were tested.
| # | Insa Turbo Ecosaver Plus
| GT Radial Champiro FE1
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
| Dimensions | R15 - R15 | R14 - R17 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. GT Radial Champiro FE1 Lowcost
1. GT Radial Champiro FE1 Sufficient
1. GT Radial Champiro FE1 Sufficient
These tyres were tested together in 1 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.

| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 34,5 | 34,3 | |||||
| Insa Turbo Ecosaver Plus | 42,4 | 42,6 | |||||
| GT Radial Champiro FE1 | 38 | 40,8 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||