Segment
1. Infinity Ecozen Lowcost2. GT Radial Winter Pro 2 evo Lowcost
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from (Infinity) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Singapore (GT). Generally, GT winter tyres are slightly better rated (55%) than Infinity (25%). In this particular case, the GT Radial Winter Pro 2 evo has a better rating of 66% compared to 25% of the Infinity Ecozen. The first tyre test of Infinity Ecozen was done in 2020, compared to 2024 when was the GT Radial Winter Pro 2 evo first tested. Important for this comparison is also the AUTOBILD 2024 205/55 R16 test, where both the Ecozen and the Radial Winter Pro 2 evo were tested.
# | Infinity Ecozen
| GT Radial Winter Pro 2 evo
| Add to comparison |
---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
Dimensions | R14 - R17 | R13 - R17 | |
Price | |||
Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Infinity Ecozen Lowcost2. GT Radial Winter Pro 2 evo Lowcost
2. Infinity Ecozen 26.33
1. GT Radial Winter Pro 2 evo Satisfactory
1. GT Radial Winter Pro 2 evo Sufficient
Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 34.6 | 28.9 | |||||
Infinity Ecozen | 37.6 | 41.0 | |||||
GT Radial Winter Pro 2 evo | 36.0 | 29.3 | |||||
Show test details |