In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Netherlands (Imperial) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Bridgestone). Generally, Bridgestone winter tyres are slightly better rated (87%) than Imperial (0%). The first tyre test of Imperial SnowDragon UHP was done in 2020, compared to 2019 when was the Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2022 215/55 R17 test, where both the SnowDragon UHP and the Blizzak LM-005 were tested. See more mutual tests below.
These tyres were tested together in 2 test(s) with detailed performance data. This page shows you a comprehensive comparison based on actual head-to-head test results instead of general rankings.
You can explore discipline-by-discipline comparisons, view the spider chart, check price differences, and see which tests were used for this analysis. Or view the general comparison →
Detailed head-to-head comparison based on actual test results
Averaged from 2 tests
Imperial SnowDragon UHP
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
Imperial SnowDragon UHP
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
Imperial SnowDragon UHP
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
Imperial SnowDragon UHP
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
Imperial SnowDragon UHP
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
Imperial SnowDragon UHP
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
Imperial SnowDragon UHP
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
Imperial SnowDragon UHP
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
Imperial SnowDragon UHP
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
Imperial SnowDragon UHP
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
Imperial SnowDragon UHP
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
Imperial SnowDragon UHP
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
Imperial SnowDragon UHP
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
Imperial SnowDragon UHP
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
Visual comparison of all performance categories from mutual tests.
Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.