Segment
1. Imperial Snowdragon 3 Lowcost2. Barum Polaris 5 Lowcost3. Laufenn I FIT Plus Lowcost
Comparison: Imperial Snowdragon 3 vs. Barum Polaris 5 vs. Laufenn I FIT Plus
Table of contents:
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
2. Barum Polaris 5 15.15
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Barum Polaris 5 Good2. Laufenn I FIT Plus Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
1. Laufenn I FIT Plus Conditionally recommended2. Barum Polaris 5 Sufficient
Add to comparison
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 3 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
3
Mutual tests
| Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 31,4 | 29,2 | |||||
| Imperial Snowdragon 3 | 42,3 | - | |||||
| Barum Polaris 5 | 35,6 | 31,0 | |||||
| Laufenn I FIT Plus | 35,1 | 30,6 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on wet | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 30,3 | ||||||
| Imperial Snowdragon 3 | 41,4 | ||||||
| Barum Polaris 5 | 35,2 | 24,9 | |||||
| Laufenn I FIT Plus | 36,2 | 24,8 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 29,2 | 24 | |||||
| Imperial Snowdragon 3 | 33,9 | 31,7 | |||||
| Barum Polaris 5 | 33,9 | 25 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
