Segment
1. Nokian WR D4 Upper-middle2. Imperial Snowdragon 2 Lowcost
Comparison: Imperial Snowdragon 2 vs. Nokian WR D4
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Netherlands (Imperial) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Finland (Nokian). Generally, Nokian winter tyres are slightly better rated (60%) than Imperial (0%). But when it comes to comparing Imperial Snowdragon 2 and Nokian WR D4, the rating is the same - 0%. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2016 205/55 R16 test, where both the Snowdragon 2 and the WR D4 were tested.
| # | Imperial Snowdragon 2
| Nokian WR D4
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R14 - R17 | R13 - R20 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
1. Nokian WR D4 14.
Average position in tests
1. Nokian WR D4 6.04
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Nokian WR D4 Highly recommended
Worst rating in test
1. Nokian WR D4 Recommended
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 1 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
1
Mutual tests
| Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 34,2 | 25 | |||||
| Imperial Snowdragon 2 | 46,8 | - | |||||
| Nokian WR D4 | 37,3 | 26,0 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
