Segment
2. Imperial Snowdragon 2 Lowcost
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Netherlands (Imperial) against a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Hankook). Generally, Hankook winter tyres are slightly better rated (83%) than Imperial (0%). But when it comes to comparing Imperial Snowdragon 2 and Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452, the rating is the same - 0%. The first tyre test of Imperial Snowdragon 2 was done in 2015, compared to 2016 when was the Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2016 205/55 R16 test, where both the Snowdragon 2 and the Winter i*cept RS2 W452 were tested.
| # | Imperial Snowdragon 2
| Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
| Dimensions | R14 - R17 | R13 - R17 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
2. Imperial Snowdragon 2 Lowcost
1. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 Highly recommended
1. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 Satisfactory
These tyres were tested together in 1 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.

| Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 34,2 | 25 | |||||
| Imperial Snowdragon 2 | 46,8 | - | |||||
| Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 | 39,1 | 26,2 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||