Segment
1. Continental PremiumContact 6 Premium2. Imperial EcoSport SUV Lowcost
Comparison: Imperial EcoSport SUV vs. Continental PremiumContact 6
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Netherlands (Imperial) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Germany (Continental). Generally, Continental summer tyres are slightly better rated (92%) than Imperial (1%). The first tyre test of Imperial EcoSport SUV was done in 2021, compared to 2017 when was the Continental PremiumContact 6 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2021 215/60 R17 test, where both the EcoSport SUV and the PremiumContact 6 were tested.
| # | Imperial EcoSport SUV
| Continental PremiumContact 6
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R16 - R22 | R15 - R22 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Continental PremiumContact 6 Exemplary
Worst rating in test
1. Continental PremiumContact 6 Recommended
Offroad
(Overall rating)Mud traction
Sand traction
Handling on gravel
Grass traction
Gravel traction
Wet
(Overall rating)Aquaplaning - cross
Wet braking
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Wet circle cornering
Wet handling
Wet braking according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry handling
Dry braking
Comfort
(Overall rating)Comfort
Exterior noise
Outside noise accoring to EU label
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 1 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
1
Mutual tests
| Name | Wet | Dry | Offroad | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 2+ | 2+ | 2+ | ||||
| Imperial EcoSport SUV Rating: Not recommended | 3+ | 3+ | 2 | ||||
| Continental PremiumContact 6 Rating: Good | 2+ | 2+ | 2- | ||||
| Show test details | |||||||
