Segment
1. Imperial EcoSport 2 Lowcost2. Debica Presto UHP2 Lowcost
Comparison: Imperial EcoSport 2 vs. Debica Presto UHP2
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Netherlands (Imperial) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Poland (Debica). Generally, Debica summer tyres are slightly better rated (56%) than Imperial (1%). The first tyre test of Imperial EcoSport 2 was done in 2019, compared to 2022 when was the Debica Presto UHP2 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2022 215/55 R17 test, where both the EcoSport 2 and the Presto UHP2 were tested.
| # | Imperial EcoSport 2
| Debica Presto UHP2
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R15 - R20 | R17 - R18 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Debica Presto UHP2 Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
1. Debica Presto UHP2 Satisfactory
Wet
(Overall rating)Aquaplaning - cross
Wet braking
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Wet circle cornering
Wet braking according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry braking
Dry handling
Comfort
(Overall rating)Exterior noise
Outside noise accoring to EU label
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 1 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
1
Mutual tests
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 35,7 | 27,5 | |||||
| Imperial Ecosport 2 | 40,3 | 33,8 | |||||
| Debica Presto UHP2 | 36,5 | 29,8 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
