Segment
2. Hankook Kinergy 4S2 X H750A Premium3. Toyo Celsius AS2 Upper-middle4. Imperial All Season Driver Lowcost
Comparison: Imperial All Season Driver vs. Toyo Celsius AS2 vs. GoodYear Vector 4Seasons SUV Gen-3 vs. Hankook Kinergy 4S2 X H750A vs. Ceat 4 SeasonDrive
Table of contents:
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
3. Toyo Celsius AS2 11.64
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Hankook Kinergy 4S2 X H750A Exemplary2. GoodYear Vector 4Seasons SUV Gen-3 Very good3. Toyo Celsius AS2 Satisfactory4. Ceat 4 SeasonDrive Conditionally recommended
Worst rating in test
3. Toyo Celsius AS2 Conditionally recommended4. Ceat 4 SeasonDrive Conditionally recommended
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking according to EU label
Snow
(Overall rating)Comfort
(Overall rating)Outside noise accoring to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Costs
(Overall rating)Fuel consumption according to EU label
Add to comparison
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 2 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
2
Mutual tests
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 38.0 | 43.9 | |||||
| Imperial All Season Driver | 43.7 | 55.2 | |||||
| Toyo Celsius AS2 | 40.4 | 51.0 | |||||
| Ceat 4 SeasonDrive | 38.6 | 47.4 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Imperial All Season Driver Rating: Not recommended | |||||||
| Toyo Celsius AS2 Rating: Satisfactory | |||||||
| GoodYear Vector 4Seasons SUV Gen-3 Rating: Exemplary | |||||||
| Hankook Kinergy 4S2 X H750A Rating: Exemplary | |||||||
| Show test details | |||||||
