Segment
2. Imperial All Season Driver Lowcost
Comparison: Imperial All Season Driver vs. GoodYear Vector 4Seasons SUV Gen-3 vs. Ceat 4 SeasonDrive
Table of contents:
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. GoodYear Vector 4Seasons SUV Gen-3 Very good2. Ceat 4 SeasonDrive Conditionally recommended
Worst rating in test
2. Ceat 4 SeasonDrive Conditionally recommended
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking according to EU label
Snow
(Overall rating)Comfort
(Overall rating)Outside noise accoring to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Costs
(Overall rating)Fuel consumption according to EU label
Add to comparison
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 2 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
2
Mutual tests
| Name | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Imperial All Season Driver Rating: Not recommended | |||||||
| GoodYear Vector 4Seasons SUV Gen-3 Rating: Exemplary | |||||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 2+ | 1- | 1- | ||||
| Imperial All Season Driver Rating: Not recommended | 4 | 3+ | 3+ | ||||
| GoodYear Vector 4Seasons SUV Gen-3 Rating: Good | 2+ | 2- | 2 | ||||
| Show test details | |||||||
