Segment
2. Hankook Kinergy 4S2 X H750A Premium3. Vredestein Quatrac Premium4. Toyo Celsius AS2 Upper-middle5. Imperial All Season Driver Lowcost
Comparison: Imperial All Season Driver vs. Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6 vs. Toyo Celsius AS2 vs. Hankook Kinergy 4S2 X H750A vs. Vredestein Quatrac vs. Ceat 4 SeasonDrive
Table of contents:
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
4. Toyo Celsius AS2 11.64
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Hankook Kinergy 4S2 X H750A Exemplary2. Vredestein Quatrac Exemplary3. Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6 Exemplary4. Toyo Celsius AS2 Satisfactory5. Ceat 4 SeasonDrive Conditionally recommended
Worst rating in test
2. Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6 Recommended3. Vredestein Quatrac Recommended4. Toyo Celsius AS2 Conditionally recommended5. Ceat 4 SeasonDrive Conditionally recommended
Snow
(Overall rating)Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking according to EU label
Comfort
(Overall rating)Outside noise accoring to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Costs
(Overall rating)Fuel consumption according to EU label
Add to comparison
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 2 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
2
Mutual tests
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 38.0 | 43.9 | |||||
| Imperial All Season Driver | 43.7 | 55.2 | |||||
| Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6 | 38.1 | 45.0 | |||||
| Toyo Celsius AS2 | 40.4 | 51.0 | |||||
| Vredestein Quatrac | 40.3 | 43.9 | |||||
| Ceat 4 SeasonDrive | 38.6 | 47.4 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Imperial All Season Driver Rating: Not recommended | |||||||
| Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6 Rating: Test winner | |||||||
| Toyo Celsius AS2 Rating: Satisfactory | |||||||
| Hankook Kinergy 4S2 X H750A Rating: Exemplary | |||||||
| Show test details | |||||||
