Segment
1. Yokohama Advan Fleva V701 Upper-middle
Comparison: Hi Fly HF 805 vs. Yokohama Advan Fleva V701
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from (Hi) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Yokohama). Generally, Yokohama summer tyres are slightly better rated (58%) than Hi (21%). But when it comes to comparing Hi Fly HF 805 and Yokohama Advan Fleva V701, the rating is the same - 0%. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2017 225/50 R17 test, where both the Fly HF 805 and the Advan Fleva V701 were tested.
| # | Hi Fly HF 805
| Yokohama Advan Fleva V701
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R19 - R19 | R15 - R20 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
2. Hi Fly HF 805 29.
Worst position in test
2. Hi Fly HF 805 29.
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Yokohama Advan Fleva V701 Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
1. Yokohama Advan Fleva V701 Conditionally recommended
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 1 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
1
Mutual tests
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 34,1 | 34,6 | |||||
| Hi Fly HF 805 | 37,5 | 40,9 | |||||
| Yokohama Advan Fleva V701 | 34,9 | 40,2 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
