Segment
1. Nankang Sportnex AS-2+ Lowcost
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from (Hi) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Taiwan (Nankang). Generally, Hi summer tyres are slightly better rated (23%) than Nankang (0%). But when it comes to comparing Hi Fly HF 805 and Nankang Sportnex AS-2+, the rating is the same - 0%. The first tyre test of Hi Fly HF 805 was done in 2017, compared to 2016 when was the Nankang Sportnex AS-2+ first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2017 225/50 R17 test, where both the Fly HF 805 and the Sportnex AS-2+ were tested.
| # | Hi Fly HF 805
| Nankang Sportnex AS-2+
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
| Dimensions | R19 - R19 | R16 - R22 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Nankang Sportnex AS-2+ Lowcost
2. Hi Fly HF 805 29.
1. Hi Fly HF 805 29.
1. Nankang Sportnex AS-2+ Sufficient
1. Nankang Sportnex AS-2+ Sufficient
These tyres were tested together in 1 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.

| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 34,1 | 34,6 | |||||
| Hi Fly HF 805 | 37,5 | 40,9 | |||||
| Nankang Sportnex AS-2+ | 36,7 | 40,8 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||