Segment
1. Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125 Premium
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from (Hi) against a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Hankook). Generally, Hankook summer tyres are slightly better rated (81%) than Hi (23%). But when it comes to comparing Hi Fly HF 805 and Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125, the rating is the same - 0%. The first tyre test of Hi Fly HF 805 was done in 2017, compared to 2016 when was the Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2017 225/50 R17 test, where both the Fly HF 805 and the Ventus Prime3 K125 were tested.
| # | Hi Fly HF 805
| Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
| Dimensions | R19 - R19 | R15 - R20 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125 Premium
2. Hi Fly HF 805 29.
2. Hi Fly HF 805 29.
1. Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125 Exemplary
1. Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125 Conditionally recommended
These tyres were tested together in 1 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.

| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 34,1 | 34,6 | |||||
| Hi Fly HF 805 | 37,5 | 40,9 | |||||
| Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125 | 34,3 | 35,7 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||