Segment
1. GT Radial Champiro FE1 Lowcost
Comparison: Hi Fly HF 805 vs. GT Radial Champiro FE1
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from (Hi) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Singapore (GT). Generally, GT summer tyres are slightly better rated (37%) than Hi (18%). But when it comes to comparing Hi Fly HF 805 and GT Radial Champiro FE1, the rating is the same - 0%. The first tyre test of Hi Fly HF 805 was done in 2017, compared to 2016 when was the GT Radial Champiro FE1 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2017 225/50 R17 test, where both the Fly HF 805 and the Radial Champiro FE1 were tested.
| # | Hi Fly HF 805
| GT Radial Champiro FE1
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R19 - R19 | R14 - R17 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
2. Hi Fly HF 805 29.
Worst position in test
1. Hi Fly HF 805 29.
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. GT Radial Champiro FE1 Sufficient
Worst rating in test
1. GT Radial Champiro FE1 Sufficient
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 34,1 | 34,6 | |||||
| Hi Fly HF 805 | 37,5 | 40,9 | |||||
| GT Radial Champiro FE1 | 37,3 | 42,8 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
