Segment
1. Bridgestone Turanza T001 Premium2. Falken Azenis FK510 Upper-middle
Comparison: Hi Fly HF 805 vs. Falken Azenis FK510 vs. Bridgestone Turanza T001
Table of contents:
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
3. Hi Fly HF 805 29.
Worst position in test
3. Hi Fly HF 805 29.
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Falken Azenis FK510 Exemplary
Worst rating in test
1. Falken Azenis FK510 Recommended2. Bridgestone Turanza T001 Satisfactory
Add to comparison
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 1 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
1
Mutual tests
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 34,1 | 34,6 | |||||
| Hi Fly HF 805 | 37,5 | 40,9 | |||||
| Falken Azenis FK510 | 35,5 | 34,8 | |||||
| Bridgestone Turanza T001 | 36,2 | 34,6 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
