Segment
1. Bridgestone Turanza T001 Premium
Comparison: Hi Fly HF 805 vs. Bridgestone Turanza T001
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from (Hi) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Bridgestone). Generally, Bridgestone summer tyres are slightly better rated (85%) than Hi (23%). But when it comes to comparing Hi Fly HF 805 and Bridgestone Turanza T001, the rating is the same - 0%. The first tyre test of Hi Fly HF 805 was done in 2017, compared to 2015 when was the Bridgestone Turanza T001 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2017 225/50 R17 test, where both the Fly HF 805 and the Turanza T001 were tested.
| # | Hi Fly HF 805
| Bridgestone Turanza T001
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R19 - R19 | R15 - R19 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
2. Hi Fly HF 805 29.
Worst position in test
2. Hi Fly HF 805 29.
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
Worst rating in test
1. Bridgestone Turanza T001 Satisfactory
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 1 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
1
Mutual tests
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 34,1 | 34,6 | |||||
| Hi Fly HF 805 | 37,5 | 40,9 | |||||
| Bridgestone Turanza T001 | 36,2 | 34,6 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
