Segment
2. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow Lowcost
Comparison: Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 vs. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Hankook) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Slovakia (Matador). Matador is a brand that belongs to the Continental group. Generally, Hankook winter tyres are slightly better rated (83%) than Matador (40%). But when it comes to comparing Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 and Matador MP92 Sibir Snow, the rating is the same - 0%. The first tyre test of Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 was done in 2016, compared to 2015 when was the Matador MP92 Sibir Snow first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2021 205/55 R16 test, where both the Winter i*cept RS2 W452 and the MP92 Sibir Snow were tested. See more mutual tests below. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 90% of Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 dimensions has C wet grip rating. Most (100%) of the Matador MP92 Sibir Snow also have C wet ratings. We also know where Winter i*cept RS2 W452 is made - Korea.
| # | Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452
| Matador MP92 Sibir Snow
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R13 - R17 | R15 - R18 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 Highly recommended2. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
1. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow Satisfactory2. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 Satisfactory
Dry
(Overall rating)Snow
(Overall rating)Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking according to EU label
Comfort
(Overall rating)Outside noise accoring to EU label
Costs
(Overall rating)Fuel consumption according to EU label
Ice
(Overall rating)Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 6 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
6
Mutual tests
| Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 32,1 | 27,3 | |||||
| Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 | 33,4 | 28,2 | |||||
| Matador MP92 Sibir Snow | 37,4 | 28,6 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 29,2 | 24 | |||||
| Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 | 32 | 24,9 | |||||
| Matador MP92 Sibir Snow | 34,8 | - | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Running costs | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1- | 2+ | 1 | 1 | |||
| Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 Rating: Good | 2 | 2 | 1- | 1- | |||
| Matador MP92 Sibir Snow Rating: Satisfactory | 3+ | 2- | 2- | 2- | |||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 34,3 | 27 | |||||
| Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 | 34,9 | 27,7 | |||||
| Matador MP92 Sibir Snow | 36,6 | 28,6 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 32,2 | 25,9 | |||||
| Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 | 35,9 | 28,6 | |||||
| Matador MP92 Sibir Snow | 38,4 | - | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 34,2 | 25 | |||||
| Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 | 39,1 | 26,2 | |||||
| Matador MP92 Sibir Snow | 40,6 | 26,4 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
