Segment
2. Kumho WinterCraft WP71 Upper-middle
Comparison: Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 vs. Kumho WinterCraft WP71
Table of contents:
In this comparison, both of the tyres are made by a brand from South Korea. Generally, Hankook winter tyres are slightly better rated (83%) than Kumho (61%). But when it comes to comparing Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 and Kumho WinterCraft WP71, the rating is the same - 0%. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2019 225/45 R17 test, where both the Winter i*cept RS2 W452 and the WinterCraft WP71 were tested. See more mutual tests below. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 90% of Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 dimensions has C wet grip rating. Most (100%) of the Kumho WinterCraft WP71 also have C wet ratings. We also know where Winter i*cept RS2 W452 is made - Korea.
| # | Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452
| Kumho WinterCraft WP71
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R13 - R17 | R16 - R19 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 Highly recommended2. Kumho WinterCraft WP71 Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
1. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 Satisfactory2. Kumho WinterCraft WP71 Conditionally recommended
Dry
(Overall rating)Snow
(Overall rating)Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking according to EU label
Comfort
(Overall rating)Outside noise accoring to EU label
Costs
(Overall rating)Fuel consumption according to EU label
Ice
(Overall rating)Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Running costs | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 2+ | 2+ | 1 | 2+ | |||
| Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 Rating: Good | 2- | 2- | 1 | 2 | |||
| Kumho WinterCraft WP71 Rating: Conditionally recommended | 2+ | 3+ | 2 | 3 | |||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 29,2 | 24 | |||||
| Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 | 32 | 24,9 | |||||
| Kumho WinterCraft WP71 | 31,5 | 24,8 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 32,2 | 25,9 | |||||
| Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 | 35,9 | 28,6 | |||||
| Kumho WinterCraft WP71 | 34,8 | 29,2 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Points total | Wet | Dry | Snow | Rolling resistance | Noise | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 412 | 142 | 127 | 143 | 25 | 10 | |
| Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 Rating: Highly recommended | 363 | 104 | 118 | 141 | 16 | 10 | |
| Kumho WinterCraft WP71 Rating: Conditionally recommended | 309 | 76 | 108 | 125 | 16 | 9 | |
| Show test details | |||||||
