18 shops, 56 847 products

Comparison: Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 vs. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001

Table of contents:

Summary
Wet
Dry
Snow
Ice
Costs
Mutual tests
Dimensions and prices
Buy %

In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Hankook) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Bridgestone). Generally, Bridgestone winter tyres are slightly better rated (87%) than Hankook (83%). But when it comes to comparing Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 and Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001, the rating is the same - 0%. The first tyre test of Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 was done in 2016, compared to 2015 when was the Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2017 225/50 R17 test, where both the Winter i*cept RS2 W452 and the Blizzak LM-001 were tested. See more mutual tests below. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 90% of Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 has C wet grip rating, whereas 72% of Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 has B rating. If you wonder where the tyres in question are made, the Winter i*cept RS2 W452 is made in Korea and Blizzak LM-001 is made in Poland.

#	Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 /0%	Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 /0%

Dimensions	R13 - R17	R14 - R21
Price	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices
Remove	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison

Segment

1. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 Premium

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 Premium

Number of sizes available

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 132

2. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 88

Number of tests

1. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 21x

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 15x

Best position in test

1. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 2.

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 4.

Worst position in test

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 18.

2. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 20.

Average position in tests

1. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 7.1

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 7.87

Year of the last test

1. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 2020

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 2018

Best rating in test

1. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 Highly recommended

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 Good

Worst rating in test

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 Good

2. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 Satisfactory

Dry

(Overall rating)

Hankook
Winter i*cept RS2 W452

83.7%

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-001

81.7%

Snow

(Overall rating)

Hankook
Winter i*cept RS2 W452

90.1%

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-001

77.4%

Wet

(Overall rating)

Hankook
Winter i*cept RS2 W452

85.2%

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-001

78.6%

Wet braking according to EU label

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 B

2. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 C

Comfort

(Overall rating)

Hankook
Winter i*cept RS2 W452

77.1%

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-001

49.6%

Outside noise accoring to EU label

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 71 dB

2. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 ?

Costs

(Overall rating)

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-001

76.6%

Hankook
Winter i*cept RS2 W452

68.9%

Fuel consumption according to EU label

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 C

2. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 E

Ice

(Overall rating)

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-001

80%

Hankook
Winter i*cept RS2 W452

79%

Add to comparison

Make

Model

Dimensions and prices

Mutual Tests Available

These tyres were tested together in 8 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.

Mutual tests

Autobild Winter tyre test 2017 225/50 R17

Name	Stopping distance on wet	Stopping distance on snow
Best values in test	32,2	25,9
Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452	35,9	28,6
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001	32,5	28,7
Show test details

Autoexpress Winter tyre test 2017 225/45 R17

Name	Points total
Best values in test	100
Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452	99,8
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001	96,9
Show test details

Autoexpress Winter tyre test 2016 205/55 R16

Name	Points total	Wet	Dry	Snow	Rolling resistance	Noise
Best values in test	100	96,9	99,8	99	100	100
Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452	97,6	92,1	99,6	95,9	86,1	99,1
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001	98,4	95,6	96	94,9	85,6	99,8
Show test details

Autoklub ČR Winter tyre test 2016 205/55 R16

Name	Points total	Wet	Dry	Snow
Best values in test	101	100	103,3	100,3
Hankook Winter icept RS2 W452 Rating: Satisfactory*	96,2	90,3	99,4	98,9
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 Rating: Good	98,6	98,3	98,9	98,6
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2016 205/55 R16

Name	Wet	Dry	Snow	Running costs
Best values in test	1-	2	2+	1
Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 Rating: -	2-	2	2	2
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 Rating: -	2	3+	2+	1-
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2016 205/55 R16

Name	Stopping distance on wet	Stopping distance on snow
Best values in test	34,2	25
Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452	39,1	26,2
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001	38,5	25,9
Show test details

GTÜ Winter tyre test 2016 205/55 R16

Name	Points total	Wet	Dry	Snow	Rolling resistance	Noise
Best values in test	412	142	127	143	25	10
Hankook Winter icept RS2 W452 Rating: Highly recommended*	363	104	118	141	16	10
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 Rating: Recommended	341	100	114	127	19	8
Show test details

ADAC Winter tyre test 2016 185/65 R15

Name	Wet	Dry	Snow	Ice	Noise	Wear	Fuel consumption
Best values in test	1,8	1,9	1,7	2,2	2,8	1	1,5
Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 Rating: -	2,8	1,9	2,6	2,8	4,0	2,5	2,3
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 Rating: -	2,8	2,6	1,9	2,9	3,6	2,5	2,0
Show test details

Comparison: Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 vs. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001

Add to comparison

Add to comparison

Dimensions and prices

Mutual Tests Available

Mutual tests

Summer

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Winter

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Allround

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands