12 shops, 56 847 products

Comparison: Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 vs. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 vs. Vredestein Wintrac

Table of contents:

Summary
Wet
Dry
Snow
Ice
Costs
Mutual tests
Buy %

#	Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 /0%	BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 /81%	Vredestein Wintrac /56%

Dimensions	R13 - R17	R14 - R19	R15 - R16
Price	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices
Remove	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison

Segment

1. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 Premium

2. Vredestein Wintrac Premium

3. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Upper-middle

Number of sizes available

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 91

2. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 88

3. Vredestein Wintrac 38

Number of tests

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 23x

2. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 21x

3. Vredestein Wintrac 11x

Best position in test

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 1.

2. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 2.

3. Vredestein Wintrac 3.

Worst position in test

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 13.

2. Vredestein Wintrac 17.

3. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 20.

Average position in tests

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 6.65

2. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 7.1

3. Vredestein Wintrac 8.36

Year of the last test

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 2025

2. Vredestein Wintrac 2024

3. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 2020

Best rating in test

1. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 Highly recommended

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Very good

3. Vredestein Wintrac Very good

Worst rating in test

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Good

2. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 Satisfactory

3. Vredestein Wintrac Sufficient

Dry

(Overall rating)

Vredestein
Wintrac

88%

Hankook
Winter i*cept RS2 W452

77%

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

68%

Dry braking

1. Vredestein Wintrac 88%

2. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 80%

3. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 72%

Dry handling

1. Vredestein Wintrac 88%

2. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 74%

3. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 64%

Snow

(Overall rating)

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

89%

Hankook
Winter i*cept RS2 W452

82%

Vredestein
Wintrac

62%

Snow traction

1. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 88%

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 84%

3. Vredestein Wintrac 55%

Snow braking

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 94%

2. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 87%

3. Vredestein Wintrac 61%

Snow handling

1. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 97%

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 92%

3. Vredestein Wintrac 73%

Snow cornering

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 86%

2. Vredestein Wintrac 59%

3. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 56%

Wet

(Overall rating)

Hankook
Winter i*cept RS2 W452

83%

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

81%

Vredestein
Wintrac

81%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 90%

2. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 88%

3. Vredestein Wintrac 71%

Wet braking

1. Vredestein Wintrac 88%

2. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 85%

3. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 72%

Aquaplaning - cross

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 84%

2. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 78%

3. Vredestein Wintrac 69%

Wet circle cornering

1. Vredestein Wintrac 88%

2. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 86%

3. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 79%

Wet handling

1. Vredestein Wintrac 88%

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 80%

3. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 81%

Wet braking according to EU label

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 B

2. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 C

3. Vredestein Wintrac ?

Comfort

(Overall rating)

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

82%

Hankook
Winter i*cept RS2 W452

80%

Vredestein
Wintrac

74%

Exterior noise

1. Vredestein Wintrac 87%

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 87%

3. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 80%

Comfort

1. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 80%

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 78%

3. Vredestein Wintrac 61%

Outside noise accoring to EU label

1. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 ?

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 ?

3. Vredestein Wintrac ?

Costs

(Overall rating)

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

73%

Hankook
Winter i*cept RS2 W452

70%

Vredestein
Wintrac

68%

Rolling resistance

1. Vredestein Wintrac 82%

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 69%

3. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 64%

Mileage

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 75%

2. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 71%

3. Vredestein Wintrac 55%

Price/value

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 76%

2. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 76%

3. Vredestein Wintrac 67%

Fuel consumption according to EU label

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 E

2. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 E

3. Vredestein Wintrac ?

Ice

(Overall rating)

Vredestein
Wintrac

86.8%

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

80.5%

Hankook
Winter i*cept RS2 W452

79%

Add to comparison

Make

Model

Mutual Tests Available

These tyres were tested together in 5 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.

Mutual tests

Autobild Winter tyre test 2021 205/55 R16

Name	Wet	Dry	Snow	Rolling resistance	Wear
Best values in test	2+	2+	1	2+	1
Hankook Winter icept RS2 W452 Rating: Good*	1-	2	1-	2	2+
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Rating: Satisfactory	2	3+	1-	3+	2
Vredestein Wintrac Rating: Exemplary	2+	2+	2-	2+	3+
Show test details